« When all you have is irony, everything looks like the opposite of a nail | Home | Get ready to be infuriated »

Connection sites and trust metrics

Posted by Mike Sugarbaker at 8:00 am on 1/31/2003

It turns out there’s another new take on Six Degrees, called everyonesconnected.com, that has some interesting spins on the idea of a social-connections site too. But it also turns out that neither it nor Friendster matter at all. The reason is trust.

I’m not going to go real deep into what a trust metric is, because for this version, the math wouldn’t necessarily have to be that overwrought anyway. It’s very simple: there are some friends you’d trust with your seat at Starbucks, but far fewer you’d trust with your car keys, and even fewer with, say, your sister in a tube top. Work out a simple numeric scale for different levels of trust, or, if you’re smarter than I am, a more complex matrix of situational variables.

The next level is, I might trust my friend, but do I trust her taste in people? Do I recommend that other people trust the people she trusts? You don’t want to just let people on your system make sight-unseen judgments about people they haven’t met or interacted with, but a secret, blanket judgment about her general taste might be helpful whilst being too vague to cause any damage. These ratings could percolate throughout the system, giving you a better sense of how much to invest in interactions with those fifth-degree types. (I have yet to run across anyone on Friendster who’s more than four away. The system’s still small, and certain of my first-circle friends are abnormally well connected, but still, makes you think.)

I know that trust problems are more complex than I paint them here, possibly to the point of being wicked. But this is the way we’re heading: not just to the semantic web, but the social web. We’re going to have to map more knowledge of finely nuanced social behavior into our game rules. Maybe we’re headed into a space that only humans are ever going to be good at. (For that matter, maybe I am.)

link here

4 Responses to “Connection sites and trust metrics”

  1. hatch.org Says:

    Trust Metrics
    Mike Sugarbaker: “It’s very simple: there are some friends you’d trust with your seat at Starbucks, but far fewer you’d trust with your car keys, and even fewer with, say, your sister in a tube top.”

  2. Schuyler Erle Says:

    Have a look at advogato: http://advogato.org

  3. Alan Kung Says:

    On Everyone’s Connected, there is a concept of links. By letting someone link to you allows them to write things about you. Would you want any strangers writing in your profile? In addition to this, you have to describe your relationship to the person you are linking to. This, we see as a subjective measure of trust.

  4. Swerdloff's Personal Life Says:

    What my friends say about me
    Friendster, FOAF etc… Trust metrics are interesting, especially when you get to see what your friends really have to say about you.

Leave a Reply

Current projects

  • Op: TTMTMFD
  • Ficsuit reboot (and I don't just mean when the server falls over)
  • Sugarbaker's Omnibus of Strange Amusements
  • OgreCave Audio Report (podcast about tabletop gaming)

"How to Speak Gibberish."

The answer is here. I have not edited, and will not edit, the page you find there. Please do not contact me about this subject; emails/comments about "speaking gibberish" will be ignored/deleted.

Contact Mike

Contact me

Colophon

Powered by WordPress

Best viewed in a standards-compliant browser, such as Mozilla Firefox

Syndicate this site (RSS, Atom)

Technorati Cosmos

Me, Elsewhere