<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Cornucopt Dev Log Comments</title>
	<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr</link>
	<description>Formerly known as Wicker: now known as the scourge of the seven content management paradigms</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: misuba</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2005/02/03/you-wont-understand-this-but-youll-be-enlightened-when-youre-done/#comment-992</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:18:49 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2005/02/03/you-wont-understand-this-but-youll-be-enlightened-when-youre-done/#comment-992</guid>
					<description>Um... hi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Um&#8230; hi!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rachael</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2005/02/03/you-wont-understand-this-but-youll-be-enlightened-when-youre-done/#comment-968</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:54:54 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2005/02/03/you-wont-understand-this-but-youll-be-enlightened-when-youre-done/#comment-968</guid>
					<description>hi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>hi
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: misuba</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2004/11/22/hierarchy-and-you-actually-me/#comment-51</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:33:27 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2004/11/22/hierarchy-and-you-actually-me/#comment-51</guid>
					<description>Spatial relationships like these are interesting to me in the context of social software, and they're underexplored, but I think they're orthogonal (ahem) to the question of hierarchy.

You might look into Cathy Marshall's hypertext research at Xerox PARC, particularly the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bush.cs.tamu.edu/~marshall/viki-sidebar.html&quot;&gt;VIKI project&lt;/a&gt; (although you have to give it up for a female IA researcher with the metaphorical stones to name two consecutive other projects AQUANET and VO5).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Spatial relationships like these are interesting to me in the context of social software, and they&#8217;re underexplored, but I think they&#8217;re orthogonal (ahem) to the question of hierarchy.</p>
	<p>You might look into Cathy Marshall&#8217;s hypertext research at Xerox PARC, particularly the <a href="http://bush.cs.tamu.edu/~marshall/viki-sidebar.html">VIKI project</a> (although you have to give it up for a female IA researcher with the metaphorical stones to name two consecutive other projects AQUANET and VO5).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ouroboros</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2004/11/22/hierarchy-and-you-actually-me/#comment-50</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:06:24 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2004/11/22/hierarchy-and-you-actually-me/#comment-50</guid>
					<description>Consider four simple relations on a chessboard: forward/back, side, diagonal, knight's move. And perhaps the long-knight's move of (+-3,+-1) for a fifth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Consider four simple relations on a chessboard: forward/back, side, diagonal, knight&#8217;s move. And perhaps the long-knight&#8217;s move of (+-3,+-1) for a fifth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: misuba</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/09/28/the-email-problem/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:22:11 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/09/28/the-email-problem/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>Thing about this is, the change of wikis only &lt;i&gt;looks&lt;/i&gt; smooth. It's actually as discrete as an HTTP POST request. If you look at history pages on well-designed wikis (or even the ones on Wicker! hah!), you'll see every change ever made to them, right down to the smallest.

The challenge there is that not every change is large/interesting enough to vote on, or even to comment on when you make it. Who decides?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thing about this is, the change of wikis only <i>looks</i> smooth. It&#8217;s actually as discrete as an HTTP POST request. If you look at history pages on well-designed wikis (or even the ones on Wicker! hah!), you&#8217;ll see every change ever made to them, right down to the smallest.</p>
	<p>The challenge there is that not every change is large/interesting enough to vote on, or even to comment on when you make it. Who decides?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bryan Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/09/28/the-email-problem/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 04:14:03 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/09/28/the-email-problem/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>The ranking brings to my mind something like karma points or a rep system... but those are based on discrete posts, nailed down precisely by time.  How do you freeze a wiki - perhaps the users can do this, time-stamping a wiki with a command, and lodging the text either locally or on server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The ranking brings to my mind something like karma points or a rep system&#8230; but those are based on discrete posts, nailed down precisely by time.  How do you freeze a wiki - perhaps the users can do this, time-stamping a wiki with a command, and lodging the text either locally or on server.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: futureStep | net.tech, academia, society & culture</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/09/18/weblogs-are-fish-or-possibly-giraffes/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:52:58 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/09/18/weblogs-are-fish-or-possibly-giraffes/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;[ wiki 101 ]&lt;/strong&gt;
Here are some great thoughts on Wikis - why they work, and why they don't. Wiki is geeky Weblogs are fish, or possibly giraffes The email problem...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>[ wiki 101 ]</strong><br />
Here are some great thoughts on Wikis - why they work, and why they don&#8217;t. Wiki is geeky Weblogs are fish, or possibly giraffes The email problem&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: futureStep | net.tech, academia, society & culture</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/08/28/wiki-is-geeky/#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:52:55 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/08/28/wiki-is-geeky/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;[ wiki 101 ]&lt;/strong&gt;
Here are some great thoughts on Wikis - why they work, and why they don't. Wiki is geeky Weblogs are fish, or possibly giraffes The email problem...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>[ wiki 101 ]</strong><br />
Here are some great thoughts on Wikis - why they work, and why they don&#8217;t. Wiki is geeky Weblogs are fish, or possibly giraffes The email problem&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: misuba</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/08/28/wiki-is-geeky/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:13:38 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/08/28/wiki-is-geeky/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Lars. If my coding efforts are good for one thing, it's entertainment. :-)

The really great thing about WIki is that it makes people believe. I'm not sure where that comes from precisely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks, Lars. If my coding efforts are good for one thing, it&#8217;s entertainment. :-)</p>
	<p>The really great thing about WIki is that it makes people believe. I&#8217;m not sure where that comes from precisely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lars</title>
		<link>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/08/28/wiki-is-geeky/#comment-2</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:53:35 -0400</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gibberish.com/wkr/archives/2003/08/28/wiki-is-geeky/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>Whoever you are - misuba - you have one great sense of humor - imo maybe - have been reading some of this - links too   the past few weeksmonths - shirkey rocks, blogs (I'm thinking of starting one - just to beat the dullest one - in the world) - still I do believe in WIKI.  It is a personal thing.

Thanks.
lars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Whoever you are - misuba - you have one great sense of humor - imo maybe - have been reading some of this - links too   the past few weeksmonths - shirkey rocks, blogs (I&#8217;m thinking of starting one - just to beat the dullest one - in the world) - still I do believe in WIKI.  It is a personal thing.</p>
	<p>Thanks.<br />
lars
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
